Who Done It?

Note (05AUG2024): At least five separate governmental investigations are probing the attempted assassination of former-President Trump. Are any of them to be believed? Power-hungry politicians. Self-serving bureaucrats. Sounds like a credible crew.

Is the report of the Warren Commission (1964) to be believed? Why not? Couldn’t the same, magical bullet have killed both President Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally?

“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.” -President George Washington (1732-1799)

“Tell me, tell me, tell me lies. Tell me lies. Tell me sweet little lies.” -from Little Lies (1987) by Christine McVie (b. 1943) and Eddy Quintela (b.1955)

-End-

Note (29JUL2024): A Question Unanswered. Amid the conflicting clamor about the attempted assassination of former-President Trump, one question seems to remain unasked never mind unanswered. Forensics! Mr. Wray, the Director of the corrupt, politicized Federal Bureau of Inquisition (FBI) pronounced that whatever struck Mr. Trump’s pinna came from the rifle supposedly of the alleged assassin. Yet, he offers no data. Are to we just to take him at his word. Well, we know how much the words of the FBI are worth.

What happened to the object that pierced Mr. Trump’s pinna? Was it retrieved? If so, was it a slug or shrapnel as once suggested by the Director? If a slug, did it come from the alleged assassin’s rifle?

If the object never was retrieved, what of the slugs entering the bodies of the three attendees? Certainly, one or more was retrieved. Did they come from the weapon in question? If so, where’s the data?

These are simple, straightforward questions demanding simple, objective answers. Forensics 101. Instead, we hear wild theorizing about the alleged assailant’s subjective motives.

Yes, the whole so-called investigation stinks, reminiscent of the lies about Kennedy’s assassination. As for motive, who had the most compelling motive? Clearly, not the alleged assassin; conveniently, he can’t testify. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, he’s dead.

-End-

Note (22JUL2024): A gunshot pierces the air. Its slug pierces the right pinna of former-President Trump. Facts emanating from this event are murky. Only one fact is clear from the start; namely, the United States Secret Service (USSS) failed in its primary mission to protect its charge.

Directress Cheatle, who had her squad of agents reportedly employed under a policy of Diversity-Equality-Inclusion (DEI), appeared to have made blunders so fundamental that they are inexcusable. The Directress takes full responsibility but refuses to resign. Another meaningless, bureaucratic bleating. Responsibility without consequences.

Since that notorious day, facts have become only murkier. Firstly, the USSS allowed only a few days of planning for security. In doing so, it established an insufficient perimeter for security of less than 400-feet.

Secondly, the Chief of the 12-manned, local policing force warned the USSS that he did not possess enough officers to meet the demands of the USSS, including keeping a patrol-car in front of the building whence the shooting allegedly occurred.

Thirdly, the alleged assassin had become the object of numerous reports from attendees to authorities a full 26-minutes prior to the first shot. Yet, the USSS allowed Mr. Trump, unaware of the report, blithely to walk onto an unprotected stage to be shot without its agents having identified the suspicious individual and investigated his presence.

Fourthly, A posting allegedly by the sniper for the USSS who shot the alleged assassin claimed that 3-minutes prior to the first shot superiors ordered him “to stand down” and not to fire at the suspect with a rifle. After the shooting began, he claimed that he disobeyed the order and “neutralized” the target, for which he was fired. That report seems to have disappeared from the Media.

That which has appeared is one of the Peanut Girls of the USSS becoming a heroine despite a video showing her apparent confusion then receiving explicit instructions including a shove from a male agent to pile onto Mr. Trump even though her short stature didn’t allow for her to protect his head and neck. DEI? Politics over protection?

So, what’s the real story? The more we learn, the less we know. Murky becomes murkier!

-End-

“Put not your trust in princes,
Nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.” -Psalms 146:3

Twenty-two November 1963. The radio had broadcasted that President John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas. The Secret Service had rushed him to Parkland Memorial Hospital, where he was pronounced dead minutes after arrival. The attending physician stated publicly on television that the back of Kennedy’s brain was hanging out the back of his neck, meaning he had been shot from the front. The powers-that-be quickly scrubbed the physician’s statement from the airways.

This commentator was a medical student at the time. After announcement of the President’s death, I was walking from the Basic Science Building to one of the academic hospitals. With me was a faculty-member of the Department of Pathology. She was commenting on the physician’s announcement.

Quickly, the spinmeisters swung into action. Shot from the front? No! From the back.

Authorities arrested the alleged shooter, Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine sharpshooter. Oswald allegedly shot the President from a 6th-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository, using an Italian rifle from World War Two, which no assassin in his right mind would choose as a weapon. Oswald denied that he had shot the President. He claimed that he was a “patsy”.

Two days later, a character from the underworld, Jack Ruby, conveniently shot and killed Oswald. At the time, the police openly were parading Oswald for all to see and anyone so inclined to kill. No Oswald. No testimony from the alleged killer, who magically had shot the President from the rear with the slug entering from the front then wounding Governor John Connally, sitting in front of Kennedy. One slug, two victims. Curious!

The records concerning the assassination are sealed with even President Trump unwilling to unseal them. Curious!

Who had the most to gain from assassinating Kennedy? Vice-President Lyndon B. Johnson, a sniveling, lying, corrupt, career politician, whom Jackie Kennedy reportedly detested. Word was that Kennedy planned to drop Johnson from the ticket in the forthcoming election of 1964. Johnson then went on to have killed almost 60,000 American men in the Vietnam Conflict, which Johnson started based upon a lie. Too bad for those 60,000 killed and the 300,000 wounded that the gullible voters hadn’t elected the Republican candidate, Barry Goldwater.

As William Buckley later said, “I was told that, if I voted for Barry Goldwater, we’d go to war in Vietnam. I voted for Barry Goldwater. We went to war in Vietnam.”

Flash forward to 13JUL2024. A sniper shoots former President Trump at a campaigning rally in Michigan. Two millimeters to the right, the slug would have killed Trump. As it was, only his right ear was wounded.

Supposedly, the Secret Service previously had employed ironclad security. With the shots, the girls of the Secret Service swung into immediate action. As he waved his fist, the 6 foot 3 inch Trump weighing 216 pounds was led down the steps from the platform, leaning on one of the Peanut Girls. Great photo-op to please The Left and Directress Kimberly Cheatle! Three girls were guarding the car intended to remove him from the scene. DEI? You bet.

Say, what about that agent from the Secret Service robbed at gunpoint in Los Angeles at Biden’s fund-raiser recently? Shake your confidence in the Secret Service? What does Mr. Trump really think about his near-death escape no thanks to the Secret Service?

The Trump-related assassin allegedly was a 20-year-old, Thomas Matthew Crooks, from the local area; using an AR-15, not considered the weapon of choice for such a mission. Two or more witnesses from the crowd claimed that before the shots were heard they saw a man with a rifle climbing up an outside ladder to the unguarded roof of the building. How did the alleged assassin know that the roof would be unguarded? How did the alleged assassin know that his ascent would go unnoticed by authorities? Meanwhile, the snipers from the Secret Service on another rooftop never noticed — or did they?

Days before the shooting, the Secret Service supposedly identified the rooftop as a source of potential threat. It did nothing to secure it, claiming it was “outside the perimeter”. Then yesterday, the sniper, supposedly one Jonathan Willis, who killed the alleged assassin posted on Facebook his claim that he had seen the alleged assassin fiddling with a rifle in his gunsight for more than three minutes but was ordered to “stand down”. When the alleged assassin began firing, the agent killed the shooter supposedly contrary to orders. For this action, he claims that he was fired. True? Whatever the case, the posting, thus far, has been buried by Big Media. More damning if true is the report that the rooftop in question had been identified as a potential source of threat 26 minute prior to the shooting. On top of that, a member of the legislative branch on television outright accused the Biden/Obama Administration of orchestrating the attempted assassination.

Who had the most to gain from the attempted assassination? The now-slain Mr. Crooks? Xi of China? Putin of Russia? Biden of America? The Democratic National Committee (DNC) spearheaded by the Obama-cabal?

The facts are that the demented, corrupt, career-politician now occupying the Oval Office was slated to lose the upcoming election to Trump. The Democrats were in disarray. Obama has a documented history of assassinating American citizens without prior arrest or trial, let alone conviction. With Trump dead, the DNC could have Biden bow out after being nominated, thereby, saving $100-million in donations for the Democratic Party, sideline Kamela with the promise of a high-level judgeship, and choose someone who likely could best the Republican replacement for Trump.

So, who done what? We don’t know. Given the opaque nature of our federal government, we may never know. What we do know is the following question: After the mystique of the Kennedy assassination, the unconstitutional invasion of Vietnam, and the recent phony claims about the benefits of the vaccine against CoViD-19, should we believe anything that the federal government or Big Media tells us about the current attempted assassination?