Note (24OCT2016): Given the rampant voting fraud especially in large, Democratically-controlled cities — voting fraud denied vehemently by the Democrat/Republican establishment and most of the Media — this posting will continue to run.
Speaking of polls, one might wonder about the rationality of some of the female electorate, be the polls to be believed. Mrs. Clinton boasted that as a response to a photograph of a Syrian child with a head-wound, she will institute a “no-fly zone” in that hopelessly embattled country. Like it or not, her policy potentially will put American and Russian military aircraft into direct combat. What then? Where will it end? Nuclear war? Over a photograph of a child? It is this type of irrationality that reportedly is the context for women, especially college-educated, to vote for Mrs. Clinton in response to the 70-year-old Mr. Trump’s boyish bragging years ago about his more youthful escapades. Better nuclear war than an aged, former Lothario? Ah yes, the Nineteenth Amendment.
“I the Lord search the heart,
I try the reins,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.” -Jeremiah 17:10
Well, as Science says, “Behavior has its consequences.”
At the moment and despite his claim to the contrary, it seems that Donald Trump may have accepted the current polling results as his destiny. That destiny is his losing the election.
Be the polls correct? Perhaps, not. Remember “Brexit”. Remember Ross Perot getting only 5% of the vote when he actually was winning.
Accuracy aside, Mr. Trump is resorting to the time-honored gambit witnessed in nations on fire; that is, claiming that the electoral system is rigged and cannot be trusted. Is Mr. Trump correct? Evidence suggests that he is. How so?
Chicago is the poster-city for rigged elections. Recall 1960. Chicago, however, is not unique.
New York City has its own problem. Given the strength of the Democratic Party and the inept fecklessness of the weak Republicans, Democrats control governance of the electoral system to the extent that Democrats, often Negroes openly sporting materials supporting Obama, even serve as officially-designated Republicans within the system (Personal communication.).
In other districts across the nation, non-registered people, including illegal aliens, vote en masse. Recall a past congressional election in Orange County, California in which the Republican incumbent, Robert Dornan, lost to illegal voting. With regard to safeguarding honest voting only by those constitutionally eligible, The Left has been incredibly successful in intimidating opponents by raising the boogeyman of “racism” to the extent that few are willing to risk libelous censure by alleging rigged elections.
To what, however, is Mr. Trump actually referring when he claims that the upcoming election is “fixed”? It seems that he is referring less to the actual balloting and more to the disproportionate percentage of the Media — Fox to some extent excepted — that unfairly and inaccurately spews its vicious propaganda to its gullible, indoctrinated audience. NPR is a glaring example when it claims being fair and balanced by interviewing Jonah Goldberg from National Review, an avowed enemy of Mr. Trump, as the ostensible conservative opposite of a neo-liberal supporter of Mrs. Clinton.
The most recent blitz of anti-Trump propaganda emanates via the Media incessantly broadcasting about a possibly illegally-recorded Mr. Trump years ago bragging in private to another man about his sexual attitude and aggressive behavior, as boys will do — behavior later denied by Mr. Trump. Subsequently, an array of women conveniently appears to accuse him of action dating back from several years to several decades although corroborating evidence remains scant. Recall Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas.
Meanwhile, the actions of the Clintons with regard to Bill’s documented, sexual assaults; his outright lying on television to the American public; and Hillary’s alleged threats against her husband’s victims essentially remain all but ignored — again, Fox excepted.
Admittedly, Mr. Trump’s response to the unproven allegations against him seems to have been counter-productive although in keeping with his narcissistic-like style. To those who earlier claimed that he was a saboteur against the Republican Party planted by Mrs. Clinton and her Democrats, Mr. Trump’s response could be considered confirmatory of their conspiratorial accusations. Few would deny that the consequences of his candidacy have inflicted severe damage upon the Party, most members of which best can be characterized as feckless hypocrites deserving the worst that their enemies can deliver.
Whatever Mr. Trump may be pales when compared to Mrs. Clinton, who is a documented cheat, liar, traitoress, and killer of Americans as well as foreign agents acting in our behalf. At least for the moment, she has embraced the Marxist policies advocated by Bernie Sanders, who mimics the old-line Judeo-Bolsheviks. The horror for the nation is that a substantial majority of young adults support Mr. Sanders and his radical ideas.
“An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” -Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975)
Is this great nation in the midst of committing suicide? Perhaps.
The mere thought that this wretched crone even can become President, let alone will become President, might leave one incredulous except it exemplifies the inescapable consequence of our devolving into a democracy — a “mobocracy” as Benjamin Franklin characterized democracy (See “Democracy? Wrong, Mr. Churchill“) — from a participatory republic as it was founded with equal rights for all in terms of life, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness but not in terms of right to vote or to hold public office. The Founding Fathers, to whom the word “democracy” was an obscenity, well knew the fatal outcome of such devolving.
If, as seems likely, Mr. Trump loses his bid for the presidency and especially if the Republicans lose both chambers of Congress, what will be the consequences of the electorate’s voting behavior? No one can predict.
If Mrs. Clinton and her Democrats then pursue policies and programs that she has espoused during her campaign, watch out! If, for example, she attempts to confiscate the firearms of law-abiding, patriotic Americans, as one policeman stated, “There will be anarchy!” Possibly so.
At the least, Mr. Trump is establishing the context for a new, political party to replace the current Republican Party. If so, many will say, “Good riddance!” Did these United States of America really need a third Bush as President? Were not the first two more than enough? (See “Did Bush Burn the Koran”?)
“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” -Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
At the most, by claiming the “big fix”, Mr. Trump is establishing a context for active resistance to the Clintons’ potentially Marxist-oriented, federal government — even rebellion. To some dispossessed, male, Euro-Caucasians, rebellion may seem inviting. After all, this nation was born in strength and blood. At the moment, it seems to be dying in weakness and tears.
Many men would agree that there is a “War Against Men” (See below.). They see masculine strength having been replaced by feminine weakness. Proud victories by humbling defeats. Historically common decency by historically uncommon depravity. Freedom of religion by freedom from religion. To these men, the aforementioned represent ingredients in a formula for disaster — nationally and personally.
What would be required to trigger revolution? Most likely, economic collapse, which some predict is nigh. They view the current context as a potentially disastrous consequence of the policies and programs of a trans-nationalistic Federal Reserve Board corrupted by its last, three Chairmen in concert with foreign, central bankers.
If the worst comes to pass, how will a majority of Americans respond? Most likely with dependent passivity instilled over decades of indoctrination by The Left. Most likely with demands for more of the toxin that caused the illness; namely, Big Government. The consequences will be failure.
Then? Will they seek someone else to blame? If so, who? George Soros, the poster-boy for disestablishmentarianism, and his ilk?
“The woman Folly is riotous; She is thoughtlessness and knoweth nothing.” -Proverbs 9:13
Admittedly, there are those to be held responsible but as accessories only. The fundamental reality is that the ultimate responsibility lies with the people itself — especially with the Christian Euro-Caucasians. It is they who allowed themselves to be raped and ravaged economically, politically, and sociologically by the disestablishmentarians dedicated to the destruction of traditional, Anglo-based, American ideals and values. It is they who elected and reëlected politicians who destroyed the Founding Fathers’ vision for this nation. Electing Mrs. Clinton — a student of the anti-American, Lefitist radical, Saul Alinsky — will be only the latest example of their decades of folly.
Ah, but will the people accept their rightful responsibility? Not likely. No, more likely they will hold totally responsible their accomplices behind the scenes who prepared and distributed the lethal poison of disestablishmentarianism.
Could there be a violent rebellion? Violence already has begun — much less by Mohammedan terrorists and much more by The Left, especially Negroes. Witness the bombing the other day of a local headquarters for Trump.
Be there rebellion, especially violent rebellion, what might be the ultimate consequences? There will be consequences, you know, and they may be most unpleasant — or, then again, maybe not.
“God watches out for little children, fools, drunks and the United States of America.” -Otto von Bismark (1815-1898)
Bismark’s comment was then. Now is now. Today, these United States of America compose a declining nation already on fire. What, if anything, can reverse the ominous trend? God?
Be there a benevolent, caring, intervening, Judeo-Christian type of God, can we reasonably expect Him to save us from ourselves — we who as a nation have renounced Him? The Old Testament says, “No!” The New Testament says — well, is there a finite limit to forgiving the unrepenting?
Be there no god or gods, we Americans are on our own. Of late, the consequences of our actions in the context of being on our own have not been so wonderful.
Whatever the case, one truth is clear, as Science says, “Behavior has its consequences.”
In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.