Posts Tagged ‘Blacks’


Monday, August 17th, 2015

Note (31AUG2015): During the past week, a Negro shot to death two, young Euro-Caucasoid broadcasters on live television. Then, another Negro shot a Euro-Caucasoid sheriff’s deputy in the back at a filling station, killing him, too.

Note (07SEP2015): The current, increasing tidal-wave of illegal aliens invading European shores mirrors the challenge facing these United States of America. Both in Europe, especially Western Europe, and these United States, the unarmed invasion of territory is greeted by an increasingly dispossessed majority not with armed resistance but with a spectrum of self-defeating responses ranging from apathy, indifference, and passivity to joyous celebration of their own demise among the self-loathing.

Science says, “If you want more of a behavior reward it.”

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” -George Orwell (1903-1950)

Today, calling Negroes by that which they racially are has become almost forbidden except among Negroes themselves, who frequently and publicly call themselves “niggers”. So, what to call them?

Ironically, the current plight of the American Negro is reflected by the confusion in nomenclature. Even American Negroes themselves do not know how they prefer to be called.

“Negro” as in the United Negro College Fund and as used repeatedly by Martin Luther King, Jr? “Colored” as in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People? “African-American”, more precisely “Sub-Saharan African-American” — but what of the Euro-Caucasians who settled South Africa before any Negroes even were there? “Black” —yet, to most African Negroes, American Negroes are not “black”?

Given the facts, perhaps American Negroes would do well to recall an answer several decades ago by a Negro given when asked about his race. It was the following:
“I am Negro. I am colored. I am not black.”

PART ONE: Context

“And you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” -John 8:32

violence n: exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse. –Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

Violence, Evolution,  & the Earth
The cosmos has existed approximately 13.7-billion years. Our planet, Earth, approximately 4.5-billion years.

For the initial 200-million years, our planet remained inhospitable to life. Then, 4.3-billion years ago, a rogue planet, Theia, is believed to have collided with it; bringing water, thereby, rendering it habitable. Shortly thereafter, life appeared — soft-bodied and uni-cellular.

550-million years ago, multi-cellular organisms appeared. With their appearance, survival became increasingly precarious, for individual and species. Previously, the life-cycle essentially had been consume energy and divide; thereby, producing exact replicas of themselves. Not so with multi-cellular ones. They are heterosexual. Heterosexuality allows for genotypic and phenotypic differentiation, in turn, allowing for rapid evolution.

For these new, more complex organisms, the process became birthing, maturing, reproducing, dying in an ehanced context of predator and prey — kill and be killed. Life and violence became fraternal twins. So it remains today.

Violence in these United States of America
Domestic violence? From its inception as colonies, these United States of America have embraced violence as a way of life. British-Americans against French. Colonists against Indians. Americans and French against British with Continentals against Loyalists. Northerners against Southerners. Bandits against lawmen. Citizens against government and government against citizens.

Foreign violence? Spanish-American War. World War I. World War II. Korean Conflict involving China. Vietnamese Conflict. Iraqi Conflict. Afghan Conflict. Most recently, primarily Euro-Caucasoid Christians against primarily Semitic-Caucasoid Mohammedans. Ironically, given the “Cold War”, perhaps better known as the “Long Peace”, the only major country against which the USA has not been at war is Russia.

“An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” -Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975)

The Founding Fathers dreamt of creating a participatory republic incorporating the Four Freedoms; namely, freedom of religion, of political speech, of the press, and of association. To them, the concept — nay, the very word, democracy — represented an obscenity. Today, the concept of democracy has become a misguided, sacred cow defecating on the dream of our founders.

Descending more quickly and more deeply into the dismal depths of democracy, this once-preëminent nation is transforming itself into that which the Chinese characterize as “a nation in terminal decline”. Once again, we have burst into a nation on fire — once again, a consequence of racial diversity.

As we know it today, the notion of racial diversity with racial equality essentially did not exist until after the Civil War. Even Abraham Lincoln publicly proclaimed Negroes inferior.

“I am not nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races; that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality; and in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.” -Abraham Lincoln (18SEP1858)

Current, domestic violence pits mainly Negroes against Euro-Caucasians; the latter a demoralized, increasingly dispossessed and dwindling majority. By and large, Euro-Caucasians are either too apathetic and too passive to defend their territory, resources, wealth, and culture or too self-loathing not to celebrate the suicide of their own kind.

Pity their youth indoctrinated by The Left via so-called education — education now quasi-Marxist indoctrination; and via entertainment — entertainment in passionate pursuit of vulgarity. They not only tolerate, not only accept, but actually demand their own disenfranchisement and demise — economically, politically, and sociologically.

The Negroid Community Today

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” -George Orwell (1903-1950)

Sadly, the American-Negroid community, as a group, has come to represent a clear and present danger to the integrity of the remnant that remains of the Republic. With support from members of The Left such as George Soros, Negroes have unleashed a tyranny by a minority to the point that many of its members feel free to riot whenever they claim, even wrongly, that a supposed injustice has been committed against one of their own.

Its members demand not only child-support for their bastardy in addition to preference in hiring and academic admission even when unwarranted but free housing, free food, free clothing, free medical care, and even free telephones. Translate “free” into Euro-Caucasians, Asian-Indians, and Orientals paying. Privilege has become license, and Negroid demands for such license now serve as a model for elements of the exploding, Latino minority to imitate. Such are the consequences of racial diversity.

See “Diversity” at:  .

Unfortunately, the Negroid community is in shambles, partially a consequence of the governmentally-sponsored welfare-state and partly as a consequence of most of its members’ refusal to assume responsibility for themselves. Eighty percent of Negroid births are illegitimate. The intact Negroid family is a mere fragment of its former self.

These are facts. Attacking the messenger won’t change them.

For Negroid demagogues and their supporters among The Left, truth matters not one whit. Truth has become no defense against the inevitable accusation of “racism” as though racism necessarily is invalid or evil. That there are no differences among the various races and sub-races simply is a lie. Ask any physician about the demographics of sickle cell anemia, for example.

Compare contributions of Jews that benefit the world — Jews who number 14-million and represent 0.2% of the human population — to contributions of Negroes who number 100-times greater and represent 20% of the human population. Judge by documented facts not ideologically-based propaganda masquerading as so-called news and entertainment.


Negroes & “Hate Crimes”
When a Euro-Caucasian commits a violent crime against a Negro, an only occasional act, ideologically-driven authorities and Left-driven media automatically label the act a “hate crime”. “Hate crime”?

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” -George Orwell (1903-1950)

To begin, the term itself represents poor grammar. “Hate” and “crimes” are nouns. Grammatically, the proper term is “hateful crimes”; hateful being an adjective. This grammatical point is not trivial. The proponents of these unfair, unjust, and outrageous laws even cannot get the name straight.

Consider the following: The “crime” part of the misnomer represents objective, behavioral activity — arson, burglary, homicide, robbery, and so on. The “hate” part of the misnomer represents subjective, mental activity; specifically, cognition and emotion — for example, 1) cognition such as a Negro’s believing that he routinely is disrespected by Euro-Caucasians; and 2) emotion such as such as a Negro’s feeling hatred toward Euro-Caucasians.

Prosecution of any citizen of whatever race or ethnicity as a consequence of subjective, mental activity represents “thought-control”. Such prosecution is dissonant with traditional, American ideals and values but consonant with the quasi-Marxist ideology of The Left. Recall that Lenin (1870-1924) defined truth as anything that benefits the Communist Party.

The act is the crime, neither the accompanying thought nor the accompanying feeling. Truly, courts historically have applied the concept of “special circumstances”; for example “assault with intent to commit murder”. Special circumstances make for a more serious charge and a more severe sentence if convicted.

Courts have applied that concept and do apply it, but they should not without direct, objective evidence. The law may demonstrate intent objectively, but it never should divine intent subjectively.

Instrumental behavior, the behavior of an organism upon its environment, is objective and public. Verbal behavior is objective and public. Both can be recorded and measured.

Intent is neither objective nor public. It is subjective and private.

Aggravated assault, for example,  is objective and public. “Intent to commit murder” is neither unless the defendant has made documented, explicit statements to that effect.

With regard to ethnic and racial relations, in Canada and the UK the legal situation has become even more egregious than in these United States of America. There, the truth literally is no legal defense in matters of ethnicity and race unless the complainant is a Euro-Caucasian. Make some member of a “protected minority” feel bad about his race or ethnicity? Go to prison.

It is tyranny pure and simple. Tyranny, especially tyranny based upon lies, takes a terrible toll. So it is in Canada and the UK. So it is becoming in these United States.

Negroid Crime
Negroes claim that police exhibit unjustifiable bias against them. Unjustifiable? Consider the following facts:

Negroes constitute approximately 13% of America’s population. Yet, Negroes commit 55% of robberies, 49% of murders, 34% of aggravated assaults; and 33% of forcible rapes. Of total crime, Negroes commit approximately 30%. Despite these statistics, the powers-that-be demand police not use racial profiling. Is it any wonder that police of every race fear for their lives when confronting Negroes? The consequence for the Negroid community is less protection from crime for the law-abiding, peaceful majority.

As for Caucasians constituting a homicidal threat to Negroes, 91% of Negroes murdered are murdered by other Negroes. Only 9% are murdered by other races or persons unknown — the latter a number that likely includes additional Negroes. In a typical, large, metropolitan area with a heavy Negroid presence, Negroes commit approximately 70% of murders; Euro-Caucasians, fewer that 10%. Despite these statistics, the powers-that-be demand police not use racial profiling. Is it any wonder that police of every race fear for their lives when confronting Negroes?

The rate per capita of Negroes committing murders is approximately 12 times higher than Euro-Caucasians and 5 times higher than Latinos. Despite these statistics, the powers-that-be demand police not use racial profiling. Is it any wonder that police of every race fear for their lives when confronting Negroes?

What of Negroid police killing Euro-Caucasians? Generally, trivialized by being ignored. Consider the case of 18-year old Gilbert Collar, a student in Alabama. In 2012, unarmed, naked, and under the influence of drugs, he was shot and killed by a Negroid policeman, Trevis Austin. The legal system cleared the policeman. Big Media ignored the event. Had the races been reversed, would the consequences have been the same?

All in all, Negroes, especially males, are prone to agitation and violence. Conversely, contrary to portrayals by the media, Euro-Caucasians, including males, are relatively tranquil and peaceful. Violence American-style largely is a Negroid phenomenon — phony propaganda from The Left notwithstanding.

“And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)

Since the dawn of multi-cellular organisms — predators and prey — has the context really changed much? Anyone who believes that it has might take a lonely stroll down a dark street in the South Bronx at night; a stroll likely to be a short one. Americans of The Left blithely ignore that civilized humans live in a state of benign captivity with a thin, blue line separating them from the nasty, brutish violence that would prevail without it.

As for policemen shooting fleeing, unarmed suspects in the back, in the more civilized past, doing so constituted accepted policing procedure. When a policeman ordered a suspect to stop, if the suspect did not obey, the policeman fired two shots into the air. If the suspect continued to flee, he became fair game for a potentially lethal wound.

What factor controls a suspect fleeing from police when ordered to stop, especially when hearing a policeman’s gunshots into the air? Nothing criminal to hide nor to be discovered?

How are the police to know that which controls a suspect’s flight? What percentage of unarmed suspects shot by police are law-abiding citizens with no criminal records?

What is the primary mission of police? To maintain law and order or to play clairvoyants, social workers or pseudo-psychiatrists?

PART THREE: Repairing the Damage

Negroes and The Left
Who suffers the most from Negroid violence? Negroes.

Rioting instigated by Negroid demagogues and their supporters from The Left notwithstanding, remove the presence of police from Negroid neighborhoods then measure the consequences. Whatever mistakes police may make, the benefit from their presence to Negroes vastly outweighs any liabilities therefrom.

Sadly, those of The Left have done Negroes more harm than good. They have reduced them, as a group, to a state of humiliation. Is not that the context in which they are rioting? Would not any group feel humiliated?


The humiliation of so-called affirmative action. Do Orientals require “affirmative action”? Critics recently have accused Harvard University of “negative action” against Oriental admissions in order to prevent too many, qualified admissions. Do Orientals feel demeaned? Do they riot? Hardly. Unwarranted, unmerited preference via “affirmative action” only demeans the recipient.

The humiliation of so-called entitlements. “Entitlements” are little more than governmentally-enforced, involuntary “charity” stolen from the productive in camouflage. “Entitlement” is nothing more than a governmental euphemism for legitimized theft via transfer of money. Receiving something earned by another and taken from another involuntarily simply because the recipient exists demeans the recipient.

In that regard, the humiliation of so-called child-welfare, a program begun decades ago for deserving widows and orphans not for outright bastardy. Then, it mutated becoming almost the sole province of Negroes. It became a curse camouflaged as kindness. It wrecked the Negroid, familial structure. Now, increasingly it is becoming coöpted by Latinos — next on the list of The Left to make all Americans dependent upon government.

Is it not time to allow Negroes to become all that each can be? Is it not time to end humiliating dependence upon government as a consequence of collective, irresponsible behavior and instead to begin uplifting independence with individual responsible behavior? Only when Negroes rightfully gain a genuine sense of pride from genuine accomplishments — whatever form those accomplishments may take — in the same manner as the rest of us, will they truly integrate themselves into society — whatever form such integration may take.

Repairing these United States of America
Complaining is one thing. Repairing is another. Repairing the nation from the ravages of the economic, political, and sociological fire increasingly engulfing it will depend less on The Who or even The What and more on The How.

Truly, repair requires a credible leader committed to stated principles. Truly, repair requires policies and programs based upon principles that are sound — scientifically-based and scientifically-driven; more precisely, the science of human behavior. Most importantly, repair requires a clear, explicit statement of how to undertake the needed repairs, including the methods by which to measure success or failure.

“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” -President Thomas Jefferson

Behavioral deficits like behavioral excesses have their consequences. We Americans must do more than complain. We must act.

Ah, but act how? Is there a way? Yes. With justice, fairness, and mercy for all? Yes.

(See Chapter Eleven, “A Dangerous Servant — A Terrible Master”, in the semi-fictional novel, Inescapable Consequences.)

Will repair require rebellion? Has “now and then” arrived? If so, rebellion in what form?

Violence via firearms by which to seize the reins of government or non-violent via civil disobedience such as refusal to pay income-taxes? Open rebellion with rebels showing themselves or hidden rebellion with rebels concealing their respective identities? Reasoned rebellion whereby rebels pursue dialogue with the powers-that-be or unreasoned rebellion whereby rebels forsake such dialogue.

The righteously discontented should hope that repair will come via the voting booth not violent rebellion. How likely is it, though? How likely is it that the productive and their sympathizers can outvote the unproductive and their sympathizers?

“He that is slow to anger is better than the mighty;
And he that ruleth his spirit than he that taketh a city.” -Proverbs 16:32

Anger is abroad in this nation now on fire. Anger colors the speeches of Donald Trump. Anger demands satisfaction. Let us hope that satisfaction be orderly and peaceful. Let us be prepared that it might not be so.  How? Hopefully, by forming an apolitical, political party scientifically-based and scientifically-driven espousing traditional American ideals and values and reflecting the Constitution of the United States of America as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.


Note: In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.


Monday, August 18th, 2014

protest n.: a solemn declaration of opinion and usually of dissent. –Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

riot n.: a violent public disorder. –Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

To the funeral of a Negroid thug who just had engaged in a robbery before engaging in a physical altercation with a policeman in which the thug was shot and killed, Obama sends three “members” of his White House. To how many funerals of Euro-Caucasians killed by Negroid policemen has Obama sent even one “member” of his White House, let alone to the funeral of Euro-Caucasoid policemen killed in the line of duty by Negroes?

To the former, the self-loathing Euro-Caucasians of The Left cheer. To the latter, they would jeer. Their behavior reflects the consequences not of education but of indoctrination.

“Just because I make you feel bad doesn’t make you right.”

With regard to ethnic and racial relations in Canada and the UK, the truth has become no defense. Make someone feel bad about his race or ethnicity? Go to prison. The truth has become no defense. Consequence? Tyranny.

In the USA, the Negroid community provides an example of this trend. With support from those of The Left, it has unleashed a tyranny by a minority to the point that its members feel free to riot whenever they claim, even wrongly, that a supposed injustice has been committed against one of them. They demand not only child support for their bastardy and to be given preferences in hiring even when unwarranted but to be given free housing, free food, free clothing, free medical care, and even free telephones. Negroid demands for such license now serve as a model for other minorities to imitate.

Truly, the Negroid community is in shambles, partially a consequence of the welfare-state and partly as a consequence of its members’ refusal to assume responsibility for themselves. Eighty percent of Negroid babies are illegitimate. The intact Negroid family is a mere fragment of its former self. Those are facts. Attacking the messenger won’t change them.

In 1950, only 25% of Negroid babies, still a high figure, were illegitimate. That’s a fact. Attacking the messenger won’t change it.

No thinking, informed person would expect the Democrats to defend a truthful portrayal of the American Negro’s situation or even to defend the right to say it. In the name of “humanitarianism”, they want an American public passive, apathetic, and dependent upon government. It is an economic, political, and social condition that confers upon them power.

Neither would any thinking, informed person expect the Republicans to defend a truthful portrayal, given the Republicans’ hypocritical and feckless performance in recent times. Go along to get elected has become their motto.

Perhaps, Negroid demagogues endlessly rekindling grievances of the past now may be having a counter-productive effect. The truth is that any real hope for Negroes lies not in playing the getting-tiresome guilt-game but in generating real respect for real achievements for themselves as well as the rest of the world. To date, how many have there been?

So, what’s a law-abiding, tax-paying, American citizen who supports the U.S. Constitution and traditional American ideals and values to do? Are we not witnessing a tyranny by a minority in which the opposing truth is becoming no defense? Yes, in the USA unlike Canada and the UK, we still have the First Amendment to protect us . . . or do we? In many contexts, such as academia, no longer.

Is there no way to return to the basic ideals and values upon which America became strong? Is there no way to renounce the values or lack thereof that are making America weak? Can Science and the Scientific Method with its specificity, objectivity, and accountability lead us towards a solution (