Note (26DEC2016): A poem —
‘Twas Christmas Day and throughout the land,
Racial propaganda was cinematically at hand.
In “selected theaters”, Hidden Figures had opened as planned
To spread misinformation labelled as grand.
“He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.” -George Orwell (1903-1950)
In these United States of America, who in the present controls telling the history of the past? Who shapes Americans’ view of history? Who? The producers of entertainment — otherwise known collectively as “Hollywood”.
Consider that Americans’ most trusted person in the world is . . . .? You guessed it. An actor! Tom Hanks, whom Americans know not by his own persona but by those of the characters whom he has played via shadows projected onto an otherwise blank screen.
“Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur. The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived.” -Petronius (1st-century A.D.)
The real Tom Hanks? In reality, he may be a great guy. Who knows? What’s worse, who cares? Apparently, not the American public as a whole.
The Real History
“No government ought to be without censors & where the press is free, no one ever will.” -Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Since the cinematic studios moved from New York City to Los Angeles early in the 20th-century, “Hollywood” politically and sociologically has tilted towards The Left — economically, too, except as economics applies to “Hollywood”. Early on, some of its productions tested the bounds of common decency, leading to the National Board of Review of Motion Pictures (established originally in 1909) finally to begin real censorship in the early 1930s. Need one comment on the current adherence in “Hollywood” today to common decency?
Then, beginning in the late 1930s “Hollywood” — a number of the most illustrious members of which were card-carrying Communists — evidenced a burst of good old, American traditionalism after Kristallnacht in Nazified Germany. Until that time, “Hollywood” had allowed Nazis’ censors dispatched to these shores by Adolf Hitler in Berlin to alter American cinematic productions. Hey, Germany represented a lucrative market — Nazis or no Nazis.
The Nazis’ censorship notwithstanding, also in the 1930s “Hollywood” began to promote the image of the American Negro. How? Initially, simply by inserting as so-called cameo-roles gratuitous glimpses of well-dressed, upstanding-looking Negroes, for example, standing in public buildings.
“Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together. Thou shalt not wear a mingled stuff, wool and linen together.” -Deuteronomy 22:10
After World War Two, “Hollywood” accelerated its push to turn these United States of America from a predominantly Christian, Euro-Caucasoid nation into a so-called multi-cultural one; including the promotion of racial miscegenation, which had been illegal in many States and today remains contrary to Scripture.
“The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.” (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1-3.)
So went the words of the late-Senator Edward “Teddy” Kennedy about legislation promoting so-called familial reünification — legislation that was to open the floodgates to Africans, Asians, and Latins. Consequence? The dispossessing of the American majority. Meanwhile, Senator Kennedy — himself a philandering, cowardly drunk who later caused Mary Jo Kopechne’s drowning in 1969 — was promising Mr. and Mrs. America that the legislation would not change the complexion of the country. It was a flat-out lie.
He also flat-out lied with the following promise: “Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually.”
Prior to 1965, the average number of legal immigrants annually was approximately 300,000. Thirty years later, it was more than 1,000,000. Kennedy also lied when he promised that few immigrants would be from Asia.
“Not representative of the typical politician!” you say? Perhaps.
Once passed into law by a Democratic Congress and signed by a Democratic President, the bill did change the complexion of the nation. It drove a stake through the demographic heart of these United States as it had been previously.
“I the Lord search the heart,
I try the reins,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.” – Jeremiah 17:10
“All for the better!” you say? Perhaps. Best to judge behavior by its consequences.
In doing so, forget your preconceived biases. Ask yourself the following: Objectively, are these United States better off today than in 1965? Economically? Educationally? Legally? Militarily? Politically? Sociologically?
Acceptance by the then soon-to-be dwindling Euro-Caucasoid majority reflected the incessant barrage of propaganda from the self-styled elitists of The Left in “Hollywood” — later the elitists in academia and the electronic Media. By 2008, the minds of Americans had become numbed to the point that voters elected a Marxist-oriented, Mohammedan-reared Mulatto of uncertain origin — someone who never had served in the military, never had owned a business, and never had held an honest job — whose primary goal seemed to be to have destroyed that which remained of “White America”. Consider his wife and he listening for twenty years to their pastor, Jeremiah Wright (b. 1941), screaming, “God damn America!”
How could such a transformation occur? Hollywood, for one!
It was said, for example, that without the actor Denzel Washington’s (b. 1954) idealized portrayals of Negroes in moving pictures Barack Hussein Obama II never could have moved into the White House.
The most recent cinematic revision of history by “Hollywood” comes in the form of Hidden Figures. To begin, ask yourself the following: Whence came the name “computer”?
According to reports about Hidden Figures, its derivation lies in those electronic machines being named after a group of Negresses led by one Dorothy Vaughn at NASA. These women supposedly computed the trajectory for the rocket that carried the Astronaut, John Glenn (1921-2016), into orbit around Earth. Among them was the light-skinned Negress, Kathryn Johnson, who worked on the project as an electrical engineer. “Hollywood” and its sycophants now are characterizing these women as “the brains” behind NASA.
So, were these women actually the first human computers? No.
The truth is that U.S. Army contracted for the development of the first, functional electronic computer years previously during World War Two. The two, male, Euro-Caucasoid developers — John W. Mauchly and John “Pres” Eckert, Jr. at the University of Pennsylvania — named the machine after a group of Euro-Caucasoid women each laboring to compute the trajectories of individual pieces of artillery. These women were the first human “computers”. As a prelude to the future, the first electronic computer, Eniac with its 18,000 vacuum-tubes, was intended to replace them.
[Note: John von Neumann (1903-1957; aka/Johann von Neumann). Hungarian-Jewish mathematician, having made truly important contributions to both mathematics and physics as well as game-theory, sometimes incorrectly is credited with the development of the first electronic computer. See McCartney, S: Eniac. New York: Walker & Co. (1999).]
So, were the Negresses actually “the brains” behind NASA? Did they even provide the computations used by NASA? No.
Electronic computers actually provided the trajectories. Subsequently, these women checked the computations for possible errors.
Does Hidden Figures represent just another in a long line of historically-oriented productions that exceed by a wide margin poetic license and that fall into the category of misleading propaganda? Historical hogwash by “Hollywood”. Apparently.
Do Negroes require such phony propaganda in order to present a creative, productive image? Apparently, “Hollywood” believes that they do.
In this age of a declining American nation on fire, to present phony images of Negroes who, nevertheless, did make notable contributions is to demean those contributions and those who made them. Doing so only fuels the fire of divisiveness and resentment.
See “Truth & Consequences” herein.
In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.