October 17th, 2016

Note (24OCT2016): Given the rampant voting fraud especially in large, Democratically-controlled cities — voting fraud denied vehemently by the Democrat/Republican establishment and most of the Media — this posting will continue to run.

Speaking of polls, one might wonder about the rationality of some of the female electorate, be the polls to be believed. Mrs. Clinton boasted that as a response to a photograph of a Syrian child with a head-wound, she will institute a “no-fly zone” in that hopelessly embattled country. Like it or not, her policy potentially will put American and Russian military aircraft into direct combat. What then? Where will it end? Nuclear war? Over a photograph of a child? It is this type of irrationality that reportedly is the context for women, especially college-educated, to vote for Mrs. Clinton in response to the 70-year-old Mr. Trump’s boyish bragging years ago about his more youthful escapades. Better nuclear war than an aged, former Lothario? Ah yes, the Nineteenth Amendment.

“I the Lord search the heart,
I try the reins,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.” -Jeremiah 17:10

Well, as Science says, “Behavior has its consequences.”

At the moment and despite his claim to the contrary, it seems that Donald Trump may have accepted the current polling results as his destiny. That destiny is his losing the election.

Be the polls correct? Perhaps, not. Remember “Brexit”. Remember Ross Perot getting only 5% of the vote when he actually was winning.

Accuracy aside, Mr. Trump is resorting to the time-honored gambit witnessed in nations on fire; that is, claiming that the electoral system is rigged and cannot be trusted. Is Mr. Trump correct? Evidence suggests that he is. How so?

Chicago is the poster-city for rigged elections. Recall 1960. Chicago, however, is not unique.

New York City has its own problem. Given the strength of the Democratic Party and the inept fecklessness of the weak Republicans, Democrats control governance of the electoral system to the extent that Democrats, often Negroes openly sporting materials supporting Obama, even serve as officially-designated Republicans within the system (Personal communication.).

In other districts across the nation, non-registered people, including illegal aliens, vote en masse. Recall a past congressional election in Orange County, California in which the Republican incumbent, Robert Dornan, lost to illegal voting. With regard to safeguarding honest voting only by those constitutionally eligible, The Left has been incredibly successful in intimidating opponents by raising the boogeyman of “racism” to the extent that few are willing to risk libelous censure by alleging rigged elections.

To what, however, is Mr. Trump actually referring when he claims that the upcoming election is “fixed”? It seems that he is referring less to the actual balloting and more to the disproportionate percentage of the Media — Fox to some extent excepted — that unfairly and inaccurately spews its vicious propaganda to its gullible, indoctrinated audience. NPR is a glaring example when it claims being fair and balanced by interviewing Jonah Goldberg from National Review, an avowed enemy of Mr. Trump, as the ostensible conservative opposite of a neo-liberal supporter of Mrs. Clinton.

The most recent blitz of anti-Trump propaganda emanates via the Media incessantly broadcasting about a possibly illegally-recorded Mr. Trump years ago bragging in private to another man about his sexual attitude and aggressive behavior, as boys will do — behavior later denied by Mr. Trump. Subsequently, an array of women conveniently appears to accuse him of action dating back from several years to several decades although corroborating evidence remains scant. Recall Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas.

Meanwhile, the actions of the Clintons with regard to Bill’s documented, sexual assaults; his outright lying on television to the American public; and Hillary’s alleged threats against her husband’s victims essentially remain all but ignored — again, Fox excepted.

Admittedly, Mr. Trump’s response to the unproven allegations against him seems to have been counter-productive although in keeping with his narcissistic-like style. To those who earlier claimed that he was a saboteur against the Republican Party planted by Mrs. Clinton and her Democrats, Mr. Trump’s response could be considered confirmatory of their conspiratorial accusations. Few would deny that the consequences of his candidacy have inflicted severe damage upon the Party, most members of which best can be characterized as feckless hypocrites deserving the worst that their enemies can deliver.

Whatever Mr. Trump may be pales when compared to Mrs. Clinton, who is a documented cheat, liar, traitoress, and killer of Americans as well as foreign agents acting in our behalf. At least for the moment, she has embraced the Marxist policies advocated by Bernie Sanders, who mimics the old-line Judeo-Bolsheviks. The horror for the nation is that a substantial majority of young adults support Mr. Sanders and his radical ideas.

“An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” -Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975)

Is this great nation in the midst of committing suicide? Perhaps.

The mere thought that this wretched crone even can become President, let alone will become President, might leave one incredulous except it exemplifies the inescapable consequence of our devolving into a democracy — a “mobocracy” as Benjamin Franklin characterized democracy (See “Democracy? Wrong, Mr. Churchill“) — from a participatory republic as it was founded with equal rights for all in terms of life, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness but not in terms of right to vote or to hold public office. The Founding Fathers, to whom the word “democracy” was an obscenity, well knew the fatal outcome of such devolving.

If, as seems likely, Mr. Trump loses his bid for the presidency and especially if the Republicans lose both chambers of Congress, what will be the consequences of the electorate’s voting behavior? No one can predict.

If Mrs. Clinton and her Democrats then pursue policies and programs that she has espoused during her campaign, watch out! If, for example, she attempts to confiscate the firearms of law-abiding, patriotic Americans, as one policeman stated, “There will be anarchy!” Possibly so.

At the least, Mr. Trump is establishing the context for a new, political party to replace the current Republican Party. If so, many will say, “Good riddance!” Did these United States of America really need a third Bush as President? Were not the first two more than enough? (See “Did Bush Burn the Koran”?)

“I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” -Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

At the most, by claiming the “big fix”, Mr. Trump is establishing a context for active resistance to the Clintons’ potentially Marxist-oriented, federal government — even rebellion. To some dispossessed, male, Euro-Caucasians, rebellion may seem inviting. After all, this nation was born in strength and blood. At the moment, it seems to be dying in weakness and tears.

Many men would agree that there is a “War Against Men” (See below.). They see masculine strength having been replaced by feminine weakness. Proud victories by humbling defeats. Historically common decency by historically uncommon depravity. Freedom of religion by freedom from religion. To these men, the aforementioned represent ingredients in a formula for disaster — nationally and personally.

What would be required to trigger revolution? Most likely, economic collapse, which some predict is nigh. They view the current context as a potentially disastrous consequence of the policies and programs of a trans-nationalistic Federal Reserve Board corrupted by its last, three Chairmen in concert with foreign, central bankers.

If the worst comes to pass, how will a majority of Americans respond? Most likely with dependent passivity instilled over decades of indoctrination by The Left. Most likely with demands for more of the toxin that caused the illness; namely, Big Government. The consequences will be failure.

Then? Will they seek someone else to blame? If so, who? George Soros, the poster-boy for disestablishmentarianism, and his ilk?

“The woman Folly is riotous; She is thoughtlessness and knoweth nothing.” -Proverbs 9:13

Admittedly, there are those to be held responsible but as accessories only. The fundamental reality is that the ultimate responsibility lies with the people itself — especially with the Christian Euro-Caucasians. It is they who allowed themselves to be raped and ravaged economically, politically, and sociologically by the disestablishmentarians dedicated to the destruction of traditional, Anglo-based, American ideals and values. It is they who elected and reëlected politicians who destroyed the Founding Fathers’ vision for this nation. Electing Mrs. Clinton — a student of the anti-American, Lefitist radical, Saul Alinsky — will be only the latest example of their decades of folly.

Ah, but will the people accept their rightful responsibility? Not likely. No, more likely they will hold totally responsible their accomplices behind the scenes who prepared and distributed the lethal poison of disestablishmentarianism.

Could there be a violent rebellion? Violence already has begun — much less by Mohammedan terrorists and much more by The Left, especially Negroes. Witness the bombing the other day of a local headquarters for Trump.

Be there rebellion, especially violent rebellion, what might be the ultimate consequences? There will be consequences, you know, and they may be most unpleasant — or, then again, maybe not.

“God watches out for little children, fools, drunks and the United States of America.” -Otto von Bismark (1815-1898)

Bismark’s comment was then. Now is now. Today, these United States of America compose a declining nation already on fire. What, if anything, can reverse the ominous trend? God?

Be there a benevolent, caring, intervening, Judeo-Christian type of God, can we reasonably expect Him to save us from ourselves — we who as a nation have renounced Him? The Old Testament says, “No!” The New Testament says — well, is there a finite limit to forgiving the unrepenting?

Be there no god or gods, we Americans are on our own. Of late, the consequences of our actions in the context of being on our own have not been so wonderful.

Whatever the case, one truth is clear, as Science says, “Behavior has its consequences.”

In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.


October 10th, 2016

“Beauty is only skin-deep, but ugliness goes all the way to the bone.” -Proverb

Radical Maternalist n.: An individual, not necessarily a woman, whose ideology combines radical feminism with normal maternalism.

Radical Maternalism is an abomination. It perverts healthy, normal maternalism with a radical ideology at odds with biology. Radical Maternalists would have us accept their angry, misguided ideology over documented Biological Science.

Let’s face some basic facts:

1) Beauty signifies genetic health. Accordingly, both sexes prize beauty.

2) Heterosexual mating is necessary for propagation of a species.

3) Humans are the most hyper-sexual animals on Earth.

4) Human males are more sexually aggressive than human females as a function of anatomy and physiology.

5) Human females are the only mammals with breasts not just teats — breasts that serve to attract males. Is it not the controlling factor in women undergoing expensive, cosmetic surgeries to augment their breasts?

6) Human females are the only animals with menses not oestrous, thereby, remaining sexually receptive throughout the year not just “in season”.

7) Human females are the only mammals sexually receptive while pregnant even though incapable of conceiving additional offspring via additional copulations.

The manufactured uproar and feigned horror occasioned by the recent release of surreptitiously and probably illegally-made recordings of Donald Trump’s private conversation with another man more than a decade ago is but another example of blatant hypocrisy by cowardly politicians and the salacious Media in a long list of such examples. The Radical maternalists’ claimed upset notwithstanding, Mr. Trump’s admittedly lewd and lascivious remarks reflect the manner in which normal males often speak among themselves. So what?

Women not only know that fact to be the truth but manipulate it to their advantage. Why else wear skirts with hemlines only slightly below their genitalia (Mrs. Clinton understandably excepted.) and necklines only slightly above their nipples?

The craven homage paid by most male politicians to the vicious Radical Maternalists in response to Mr. Trump’s exhibiting normal, male, verbal behavior — the same behavior exhibited by most of these obsequious, unctuous fops — should be sufficient to sicken any voter with the intelligence and political awareness above an imbecile’s. These feckless, hypocritical sycophants and their ilk have been selling out this nation for decades.

Meanwhile, the truth about the Clintons’ own sexual behaviors and the infamous lies derived therefrom indicts this pair of evildoers beyond anything that can be said against Mr. Trump’s verbal behavior. Which of the two, major candidates is unfit even to run, let alone be elected — “Crooked Hillary” or “The Donald”? The answer can be found in the nicknames themselves.

“Every nation has the government for which it is fit.” -Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821)

Any normal, self-respecting American male who falls for the affectations of both Democratic and Republican politicians, none of whom cares one whit about anything but being elected or reëlected, deserves that which he gets — economic, political, and sociological castration. Is it any wonder why these United States of America have become a nation in decline — a nation on fire? To answer that question, one need only glance at the current political campaigns and the aforementioned castration of the American male inherent therein.

Sexual warfare? Yes, it exists. No, it is not the “War On Women” invidiously fabricated by the Democrats but an actual “War Against Men” declared by Radical Maternalists and supported by most politicians of both major political parties.

In this war, is it not time for American men proudly and righteously to defend their manhood? Is it not time for American women proudly and righteously to stand by their men — those who have a man, that is? Be advised, doing so is vital for the defense of traditional, American ideals and values; the Constitution; and the nation itself.

“I the Lord search the heart,
I try the reins,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.” -Jeremiah 17:10

Behavior has its consequences. Judge it thereby.

See “True Grit”.

In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.


September 26th, 2016

Note (03OCT2016): A new rumor suggests that Mrs. Clinton’s signs of neurological disorder might be a consequence of her being afflicted with pseudobulbar palsy not Parkinson’s Disease. Whereas the motoric signs of that disorder themselves are alarming, the associated, emotional disturbance is even more so. Given the actual, demonstrated signs of some, underlying, neurological pathology, that a substantial portion of the electorate would consider conferring upon this woman the presidency is a sad testimonial to the status of this nation in decline — this nation on fire. Then again, consider the alternatives.

Note (27SEP2016): In the nationally-televised, so-called debate last evening, Mrs. Clinton definitely held her own and even bettered a defensive, disjointed Mr. Trump. Regarding Parkinson’s Disease (PD), she showed no definitive signs although she did display a couple of episodes of momentary “blocking” — certainly, nothing definitive.

Does her performance mean that she does not have PD? No.


Rumors circulate claiming that Hillary Clinton is suffering from Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Even the slightest question in that regard should disqualify her from seeking the presidency.

PD is a chronic, debilitating, ultimately fatal disease of the brain that depletes the basal ganglia of a vital neurochemical, dopamine. Its signs and symptoms can be more — much more — than muscular rigidity, tremor at rest, and postural instability; awful as they themselves are. They also include severe depression and outright psychosis.

The etiology appears to be the switching to “ON” later in life of a genetic mechanism. Causal mechanism underlying the switching? Unknown.

There is no cure for PD. Treatments all are symptomatic, but none change the ultimate outcome or increase life-span. Prognosis is grim.

Tonight, Mrs. Clinton engages in a nationally televised debate. How will her health, such as it is, affect her performance. We know that she is taking medications. How will they affect her performance?

Whatever the case, would you want such a person in sole command of your next flight on an airliner? No? In that case, would you want such a person, as President, in the midst of a bout of severe depression with delusions, having her tremulous finger on the nuclear button?

In order to dismiss such medical rumors, Mrs. Clinton immediately should submit to neurological evaluation by an independent panel of neurologists with results made public. Will she? Not likely.

Forget not, Science tells us, “Behavior has its consequences.”

In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.


September 19th, 2016

“Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” -Galatians VI:7

“Sick again is she, Doc?”



“That’s what I read.”


“Who knows? That’s what they claimed. Yet, her physician prescribed antibiotics.”

“I thought antibiotics aren’t helpful against viral pneumonia . . . only bacterial, true?”

“True! Actually, for the patient suffering from viral pneumonia there are no benefits only risks. Antibiotics are indicated when a secondary, bacterial infection occurs on top of the viral.”

“Did she have a secondary bacterial infection?”

“Who knows? If she did, one wonders if there is some, underlying pathology. After all, she’s had a chronic cough. Say, remember that bet I made with John several months ago?”

“Yeah, at the cigar salon.”

“What did I bet?”

“That Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be the Democratic candidate for President on November 8th.”

“Remember my thesis?”

“That she made a deal with Obama not to prosecute her for her deceitful lying and death-dealing sedition . . . among other things . . . in exchange for dropping out of the presidential race before the election but after the primaries ended in August.”

“What do you think of that thesis?”

“Possible but unlikely.”

“Why unlikely?”

“I dunno. Just seems farfetched. I can’t see that avaricious, self-centered bih . . . uh, witch . . . giving up for any reason her chance to reign from the White House.”

“Still, you admit that which I say is possible?”

“I guess so.”

“Only guess? Perhaps, then, you’d like to bet against me.”


“I asked whether, like John, you’d like to bet against me?”

“Um . . . we’ll see what happens.”

“So we shall. So we shall.”


Possible political intrigue notwithstanding, medically the question is if Hillary Clinton is fit to function as President of these United States of America? Let’s look at some established facts.

1) FACT: In recent years, she has suffered recurrent bouts of syncope (i.e., “fainting spells”). Why? Who knows? That which we do know is recurrent bouts of syncope, especially among the elderly — she is elderly — are alarming, raising the following question: Is there existent some underlying, ominous pathology (e.g., cardiac arrythmias or mini-strokes).

2) FACT: Currently, she is taking anti-coagulant medication to prevent blood-clots. Why? She suffers from deep vein thromboses (“DVT” — blood-clots) in her legs. DVT is a serious condition that can lead to sudden death from a clot shooting from the leg to the lung, a phenomenon known as pulmonary embolism.

3) FACT: Recently during a televised debate, Hillary exhibited masked facies (i.e., persistently flat, fixed, facial expression) and abnormally slowed speech, appearing to be drugged. Given her medical condition, these signs could reflect the medications that she is taking both acutely and chronically — or possibly something else. Who knows?

4) FACT: Her political handlers and she continually have lied, both by commission and omission, about her medical status. Healthy people rarely lie about their health unless they intentionally are malingering to achieve some ill-gotten gain such as undeserved payments for feigned disabilities. Why would her handlers and she lie unless they are hiding something unfavorable?

Will Hillary Clinton be on the ballot in November? Who knows?

Should she be on the ballot? From the medical perspective alone? No!

Behavior has its consequences. Since the ascension of Franklin Delano Roosevelt to that which, over the decades, has become the imperial, presidential throne, the consequences of the policies and programs of most sitting-presidents have been disastrous — economically, militarily, politically, and sociologically. Excepting the respite granted to us Americans unintentionally by Adolf Hitler and Hideki Tojo in the form of prosperity post-World War Two, this nation has been on a progressively downward slide since President Calvin Coolidge left office in 1929.

How much longer can this nation now on fire, figuratively and literally, absorb the punishment? A healthy Hillary Clinton would be sufficiently damaging. An unhealthy one, mentally and physically? When you vote this November, ideology notwithstanding, remember that it’s the consequences of your vote that will determine the quality of life for all of us and those who follow us. In the war between ideology and reality, ultimately reality always wins.

In order to comment, you must be registered with WordPress.